Subversion Repositories filter_foundry

Rev

Rev 437 | Rev 452 | Go to most recent revision | Details | Compare with Previous | Last modification | View Log | RSS feed

Rev Author Line No. Line
60 peter 1
 
198 daniel-mar 2
Building FilterFoundry with OpenWatcom
3
======================================
60 peter 4
 
437 daniel-mar 5
Tested with OpenWatcom 1.9 and OpenWatcom 2.0 together with Adobe Photoshop SDK 2021.
60 peter 6
 
107 dmarschall 7
 
192 daniel-mar 8
Prerequisites
9
-------------
107 dmarschall 10
 
11
1) Flex and Bison
192 daniel-mar 12
   Available here:
13
   https://sourceforge.net/projects/winflexbison/
107 dmarschall 14
 
15
2) Adobe Photoshop SDK
192 daniel-mar 16
   Available on some Photoshop CDs, or can be downloaded at
17
   https://www.adobe.com/devnet/photoshop/sdk.html
107 dmarschall 18
 
61 peter 19
3) Watcom 1.6beta RC1 or later
192 daniel-mar 20
   Available here:
21
   http://www.openwatcom.org/
22
   After installing, do a reboot, or set the environment manually.
60 peter 23
 
24
 
193 daniel-mar 25
Build setup
26
-----------
107 dmarschall 27
 
193 daniel-mar 28
There is no special build setup required.
437 daniel-mar 29
Just open **wpj\filterfoundry.wpj** in Watcom's IDE and click "Make target".
60 peter 30
 
437 daniel-mar 31
Alternatively, run **wpj\make_watcom.bat** which should do the same.
32
 
192 daniel-mar 33
IMPORTANT: Your path must not contain whitespaces!
34
For example, you must not use "C:\Users\John Doe\SVN\Filter Foundry\".
107 dmarschall 35
 
60 peter 36
 
192 daniel-mar 37
Troubleshooting
38
---------------
107 dmarschall 39
 
192 daniel-mar 40
- Please make sure that you must not have whitespaces in the pathname.
107 dmarschall 41
 
204 daniel-mar 42
- Missing **sdkddkver.h**:
43
  * In OpenWatcom 1.9:
44
    If you get the error message "Fatal Error! 62:  Unable to open 'sdkddkver.h'", please open 
45
    pluginsdk\photoshopapi\photoshop\PITypes.h in your Adobe Photoshop SDK and
46
    comment out the line "#include <sdkddkver.h> // for WINVER".
384 daniel-mar 47
    Alternatively, you can create an empty sdkddkver.h file in your wpj folder.
440 daniel-mar 48
  * Take care that the directory "." is added to the include path of the C-compiler
49
    and the RC-compiler!
107 dmarschall 50
 
51
- It is important that the correct calling convention is used.
52
  The calling convention needs to be set in
53
  Options -> C Compiler Switches -> Memory Model and Processor Switches.
54
  There, select "Pentium Pro stack-based calling" (default is "Pentium Pro register based calling").
55
  The wpj project should already have this setting applied.
56
 
57
- If you receive the error message "lex.yy.c(580): Error! E1009: Expecting ';' but found '1'",
58
  check if the compiler directive "YY_SKIP_YYWRAP" is set.
192 daniel-mar 59
  Go to Options -> C Compiler Switches -> Source switches, and add YY_SKIP_YYWRAP=1 .
107 dmarschall 60
  The wpj project should already have this setting applied.
61
 
192 daniel-mar 62
- The path to the Photoshop SDK and to Win Flex/Bison (PreBuild event)
63
  is already set in the project file. Please note that changing these
437 daniel-mar 64
  paths is a bit complicated. There are several bugs in older versions of OpenWatcom
192 daniel-mar 65
  where you can only make the pre-build-events shorter, but not longer).
66
  You have to edit the WPJ file with a text editor.
67
  Remember how many characters you have added or deleted,
437 daniel-mar 68
  and subtract or add them to the number written above the before-instructions.
69
  This is the number of bytes of the commands.
107 dmarschall 70
 
198 daniel-mar 71
- In the code, it is important that all variables are declared at the
72
  top of the scope (curly brackets) and that there is no executable code or
73
  assignments in between.
192 daniel-mar 74
 
437 daniel-mar 75
Wrong:
198 daniel-mar 76
 
437 daniel-mar 77
    int a;
78
    int b = GetXYZ();
79
    int c;
80
 
81
Correct:
82
 
83
    int a;
84
    int b;
85
    int c;
86
    b = GetXYZ();
87
 
88
 
404 daniel-mar 89
Attention! Some optimizations break the code
90
--------------------------------------------
91
 
92
Don't choose "Fastest possible code (-otexan)" for optimization!
93
 
94
As soon as "Disable stack depth checking" is enabled, the code crashes
95
on some combinations of machines and Photoshop versions.
96
 
97
Win98 VM + Photoshop 3.0.x: Clicking any button (Make, Load, Cancel) will cause SegFault.
98
Win10 PC + Photoshop 3.0.x: No problem.
99
 
100
"otexan" contains "s" (because "ox" is equal to "obmiler" and "s").
101
 
102
So, "-otexan" means:
103
 
104
- Branch prediction (-ob)
105
- Loop optimizations (-ol)
106
- In-line intrinsic functions (-oi)
107
- Instruction scheduling (-or)
108
- Math optimizations (-om)
109
- Expand function in-line (-oe)
110
- Disable stack depth checking (-s)
111
 
112
The program works if "-ot" is enabled and all other optimizations (except "s") are enabled.
113
 
114
However, for now we just use the optimizations which "-otaxan" contains, except "s",
115
so we enabled:
116
 
117
- Time optimizations (-ot)
118
- Branch prediction (-ob)
119
- Loop optimizations (-ol)
120
- In-line intrinsic functions (-oi)
121
- Instruction scheduling (-or)
122
- Math optimizations (-om)
123
- Expand function in-line (-oe)
124
 
125
I haven't been able to detect why/where the stack is overloaded.
126
If anyone has an idea, please contact me.
127
Maybe the initial stack size is just too small?
128
Because the code should be OK - Application Verifier has not detected anything wrong.
129
 
130
https://open-watcom.github.io/open-watcom-v2-wikidocs/c_readme.html
131
http://www.azillionmonkeys.com/qed/watfaq.shtml (Q19)
132
 
133
 
60 peter 134
Remarks
192 daniel-mar 135
-------
60 peter 136
 
192 daniel-mar 137
flex and bison are currently invoked as a batch process.
60 peter 138
This is defined in the menu File->Before.
192 daniel-mar 139
The IDE fails to build the project when filenames contain more than one dot.
61 peter 140
Therefore the output files of bison and lex are renamed.
60 peter 141
There is no error checking done.
142
Probably it would be better to write a small wmake file for this purpose.